Five Year Post-Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Aneurysm Sac Evolution in the GREAT Registry: an Insight in Diabetics Using Propensity Matched Controls.

OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in the five year abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac regression rate after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: An international prospective registry (Europe, USA, Brazil, Australia, and New Zealand) of patients treated with the GORE EXCLUDER endograft. All scheduled EVARs for infrarenal AAA between 2014 and 2016 with complete five year imaging follow up were included. Emergency procedures, ancillary proximal procedures, and inflammatory and infectious aetiologies were excluded. Descriptive and inferential statistics, and Cox proportional hazards survival models were used. A control group of patients without DM with similar age and comorbidities was selected using propensity scores, matched in a 1:2 scheme. RESULTS: A total of 2 888 patients (86.1% male; mean age 73.5 ± 8 years) was included, of whom 545 (18.9%) had DM. Patients with DM had higher rates of hypertension (89.2% vs. 78.4%), dyslipidaemia (76.0% vs. 60.7%), coronary artery disease (52.3% vs. 37.9%), and chronic renal impairment (20.9% vs. 14.0%) (all p < .001). The mean pre-procedural AAA diameter was 58.1 ± 10 mm. Five years post-EVAR, the type 1A endoleak rate was 1.1% (0.6% DM vs. 1.2% non-DM), the endograft related re-intervention rate was 7.3% (6.2% vs. 7.6%), the major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rate was 1.4% (1.1% vs. 1.5%), and aortic related mortality rate was 1.0% (0.6% vs. 1.2%), without statistically significant differences between groups. The overall five year mortality rate was higher in diabetics (36.3% vs. 30.5%; hazard ratio [HR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07 - 1.58; p = .001). No statistically significant differences were found in sac regression rate (≥ 5 mm) between diabetics and non-diabetics 70.0% vs. 73.1%; HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.75-1.04; p = .131. These differences remained statistically non-significant after excluding patients performed out of instructions for use (p = .61) and patients with types 1, 2 or 3 endoleaks (p = .39). CONCLUSION: The paradoxical relationship between DM and AAA does not appear to result in differences in post-EVAR sac regression rates. However, even when controlling for other comorbidities, patients with DM undergoing EVAR may have a higher five year mortality rate.

Psoas muscle analysis as a surrogate marker of sarcopenia and frailty: A multicenter analysis of predictive capacities over short- and long-term outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVES: Several predictive models exist for estimating the postoperative risks of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, although no particular tool has seen widespread use. We present the results of a multicenter, historic cohort study comparing the predictive capacity of the psoas muscle area (PMA), radiodensity (PMD), and lean muscle area (LMA) as surrogate markers of sarcopenia, over short- and long-term outcomes after AAA repair, compared to the mFI-5 and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scales. METHODS: Retrospective review was conducted of all consecutive AAA elective repair cases (open or endovascular) in three tertiary-care centers from 2014 to 2019. Cross-sectional PMA, PMD, and LMA at the mid-body of the L3 vertebra were measured by two independent operators in the preoperative computed tomography. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine optimal cutoff values. Bivariate analysis, logistic regression, and Cox's proportional hazards models were built to examine the relationship between baseline variables and postoperative mortality, long-term mortality, and complications. RESULTS: 596 patients were included (mean age 72.7 ± 8 years, 95.1% male, 66.9% EVAR). Perioperative mortality was 2.3% (EVAR 1.2% vs open repair 4.6%, p = .015), and no independent predictors could be identified in the multivariate analysis. Conversely, an age over 74 years old (OR 1.84 95%CI 1.25-2.70), previous heart diseases (OR 1.62 95%CI 1.13-2.32), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.61 95%CI 1.13-2.32), and a PMD value over 66 HU (OR 0.58 95%CI 0.39-0.84) acted as independent predictors of long-term mortality in the Cox's proportional hazards model. Heart diseases (congestive heart failure or coronary artery disease), serum creatinine levels over 1.05 mg/dL, and an aneurysm diameter over 60 mm were independent predictors of major complications. CONCLUSION: Surrogate markers of sarcopenia had a poor predictive profile for postoperative mortality after AAA repair in our sample. However, PMD stood out as an independent predictor of long-term mortality. This finding can guide future research and should be confirmed in larger datasets.

Self-Made Bovine Pericardial Tube Grafts for the Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Infections.

BACKGROUND: Aortic infections are uncommon but life-threatening diseases. The material of choice for aortic reconstruction is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study is to examine the short- and mid-term outcomes in the treatment of abdominal aortic infections using self-made bovine pericardium tube grafts. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study collected all patients who underwent in situ abdominal aortic reconstruction using self-made bovine pericardial tube grafts between February 2020 and December 2021 in a tertiary care center. Patient comorbidities, symptoms, radiological, bacteriological, and perioperative findings, as well as postoperative outcomes, were analyzed. RESULTS: Bovine pericardial aortic tube grafts were used in 11 patients (10 males, median age 68.7 years). Two patients presented with a native aortic infection, and 9 had graft infections (4 bypass grafts, 4 endografts, and a plurioperated patient who had undergone both endovascular and open procedures). There were 2 emergent surgeries due to infectious aneurysm ruptures. All patients were symptomatic, and the most frequent clinical finding was lumbar or abdominal pain (36%), followed by wound infection (27%), and fever (18%). Seven bifurcated and 4 straight pericardial tube grafts were needed. Purulent drainage was obtained around the previous graft or in the aneurysmal sac in 7 cases; intraoperative cultures were positive in 6 cases (gram + bacteria). Two patients died in the immediate postoperative period (perioperative mortality 18%; urgent procedures 50%; scheduled procedures 11%). One patient had a major complication due to bilateral severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pneumonia. There was 1 single reintervention to control hemostasis due to bleeding nongraft-related. The median follow-up was 14.1 months (3-24 months). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary experience in the treatment of abdominal aortic infections by in situ reconstruction with self-made bovine pericardial tube grafts shows promising results. These should be confirmed in the long term.

Midterm Outcomes of Antegrade In Situ Laser Fenestration of Polyester Endografts for Urgent Treatment of Aortic Pathologies Involving the Visceral and Renal Arteries.

OBJECTIVE: Aortic endografting and antegrade in situ laser fenestration of visceral arteries (LFEVAR) may be considered as an alternative to open surgery for the emergency repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in fragile patients. The aim of this article was to evaluate the midterm results of LFEVAR performed with polyester endografts. METHODS: From August 2015 to December 2020, all consecutive LFEVAR performed for non-deferrable treatment of complex AAA were analysed. Polyester endografts were deployed and subsequently fenestrated using an atherectomy laser probe; the fenestrations were enlarged using cutting and semicompliant balloons before implantation of balloon expandable bridging stents into the target vessels. Prospectively collected midterm survival, patency, and re-intervention rates were analysed. RESULTS: Forty four procedures were performed for 11 type 1a endoleaks, five thoraco-abdominal aneurysms, 20 pararenal aneurysms, four segmental renal artery (RA) preservations, three anastomotic aneurysms, and one aortic dissection. One hundred and eight laser fenestrations were performed (26 for the superior mesenteric artery [SMA], 13 for the coeliac trunk, 33 and 31 for the right and left RA, respectively). The median ischaemia duration was 7, 48, 48, and 45 minutes, respectively. The technical success rate was 97%, with no open surgical conversions. The 30 day mortality was 4.5% (n = 2). No spinal cord ischaemia events were observed nor early stent related complications. Kaplan-Meier overall survival at two years was 73%, the aortic related re-intervention free survival was 70%, and the stent related re-intervention free survival was 90.6%. Four target vessel thromboses were detected, of which three were rescued. Three type IIIc endoleaks, one RA false aneurysm, and one SMA stenosis, required re-intervention during a median follow up of 24.7 months. CONCLUSION: Antegrade LFEVAR is feasible, safe, and provides satisfactory early and midterm outcomes for non-deferrable treatment of aortic pathologies involving the visceral segment. Long term data are mandatory to confirm the usefulness of this promising off label technique.

Prospective analysis on carotid endarterectomy: intermediate-deep ultrasound-guided cervical blockade versus general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The best regional anesthesia plan with the best clinical results for Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has not been defined yet. METHODS: Prospective multicentric observational study of two non-randomized matched cohorts including patients undergoing elective unilateral CEA (N.=100) between January-October 2021. Main outcomes were cerebral oximetry measurements, verbal numeric pain score assessment, peripheral nerve blockades and in-hospital stay. The main objective is to compare results achieved after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) performed under loco-regional blockade (LRB) versus general anesthesia (GA), in terms of intraoperative hemodynamic and neurologic variability. Patients undergoing LRB were performed under ultrasound (US) guidance and mild sedation. RESULTS: The LRB and GA groups showed no differences in comorbidities and risk factors. However, there was a significant difference in the intraoperative hemodynamic behavior due to the amount of vasoactive drugs used (0% vs. 16% for phenylephrine, P=0.006). The results showed neurological stability through the cerebral oximetry measurements during the procedure except for the left hemisphere de-clamp values, which were higher in the GA group (68.7±9.9 vs. 72.7±8.8; P=0.035). There were also significant differences in the verbal pain scale scores assessed 6 hours and 12 hours after the procedure; better pain control was evidenced in the LRB group (0[0-1] vs. 1[0-3], P=0.01; 1[0.5-2] vs. 0[0-2], P=0.01). An increased transient hypoglossal and laryngeal nerves blockade was observed in the LRB group (30% vs. 4%; P<0.001). The in-hospital length of stay was longer in the GA group (77.2±36.3 hours vs. 129.1±41.1 hours; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of intermediate-deep cervical plexus blockade for CEA confers similar neurologic stability as GA does, there is a difference on the hemodynamic behaviour due to the differences in vasoactive drug consumption. Loco-regional techniques provide a better postoperative pain control and shorten in-hospital length of stay.

An early single-center experience with the Relay double inner-branch arch endograft.

Background: Open surgery remains the gold standard technique for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies, although endovascular techniques offer a new opportunity for patients deemed unfit for open repair. This paper assesses the early outcomes of patients treated with a double inner-branched arch endograft in a single, tertiary-care institution. Methods: All consecutive cases of elective endovascular arch repair from 2016 to 2022 were included in a prospective database. All procedures were performed using the custom-made Relay® (Terumo Aortic-Bolton Medical Inc., Sunrise, FL, USA) double inner-branched endograft; an extra-anatomical bypass was associated in all cases to preserve the patency of supra-aortic trunks. Comorbidities, periprocedural data, immediate results and follow-up complications were analyzed. Results: Twelve patients were treated during the study period [mean age 74±7 years, 100% male, 58% American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) risk ≥3]. Treated conditions included aneurysms (n=9), one pseudoaneurysm, one aortic ulcer and a type IA endoleak. The technical success rate was 100%. Early complications included respiratory insufficiency (n=3; 25%), stroke (n=1; 8.3%), acute coronary syndrome needing coronary stenting (n=1; 8.3%), and one perioperative death (n=1; 8.3%) secondary to an intracranial bleeding after coronary stenting. One patient required early reintervention due to retroperitoneal iliac access bleeding (n=1; 8.3%). During a median follow-up of 15.5 (range, 0-44) months, four patients suffered neurological events (two of them of cardioembolic origin), one reintervention was needed (subclavian anastomosis pseudoaneurysm), and a type IB endoleak was diagnosed. Overall mortality was of 17% (n=2), with an 83% overall survival at 2 years. The aortic-related death-free survival was 100%. Conclusions: Endovascular treatment of aortic arch pathology is feasible and shows promising early mortality and stroke rates in high-risk candidates. The main short and midterm goal should be minimizing neurological complications. A longer follow-up is mandatory to determine the effectiveness of the technique and to detect device related complications.

Prospective Observational Study after Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy with Ultrasound-Guided Deep-Intermediate Cervical Plexus Blockade.

(1) Introduction: The aim was to describe the anesthetic and surgical technique of eversion carotid endarterectomy performed under intermediate-deep cervical block with sedation, and to analyze the intraoperative and postoperative results. (2) Material and Methods: Thirty cases of unilateral eversion carotid endarterectomy (n = 30), performed between 2019-2020 in a tertiary center under intermediate-deep ultrasound-guided cervical plexus block and sedation, were prospectively observed and analyzed. Hemodynamic (blood pressure, heart rate) and neurological (cerebral oximetry) variables were measured in four intraoperative phases: at the beginning of the operation, prior to carotid clamping, after unclamping and at the end of the operation. We assessed acute postoperative pain in a numerical rating scale at 6, 12 and 24 h, early and 30-day complications, and length of stay. (3) Results: Baseline mean arterial pressure values were 100.4 ± 18 mmHg, pre-clamping 95.8 ± 14 mmHg, post-clamping 94.9 ± 11 mmHg, and at the end of the operation 102.4 ± 16 mmHg. Cerebral oximetry values were 61.7 ± 7/62.7 ± 8, 68.5 ± 9.6/69.1 ± 11.7 and 68.1 ± 10/68.1 ± 10 for the left and right hemispheres at baseline, pre- and post-clamping, respectively. The pain assessment showed a score less than or equal to 3. The incidence of residual nerve block, early complications, and major complications in the first 30 days was 40%, 16.7% and 3.3%, respectively. (4) Conclusions: The combination of intermediate-deep cervical plexus block and low-dose sedation is an effective and safe alternative in awake eversion carotid endarterectomy.

Midterm results of endovascular versus open surgical repair for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms in low surgical risk patients.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze midterm outcomes of endovascular repair (EVAR) versus open repair (OR) for treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in low surgical risk patients. METHODS: Elective patients with AAAs undergoing treatment from 2003 to 2017 in a single, tertiary-care institution were evaluated. All patients with a low preoperative risk of complications and perioperative mortality (Medicare Aneurysm Scoring System <3) were included, and rates of perioperative and long-term mortality, adverse events, and reintervention were evaluated for EVAR and OR. A propensity score-matched cohort, leveling age, risk factors, and comorbidities was additionally performed. RESULTS: A total of 227 patients were included (EVAR 59.9% and OR 40.1%) and followed for a mean of 80 ± 48 months. Patients undergoing EVAR were older (66.6 ± 5 vs. 64.1 ± 6 years; P <.001), had a higher body mass index (29.6 ± 4 vs 28.1 ± 3 kg/m2; P = .005), a higher prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (27.3% vs 9.9%; P = .001), and lower prevalence of dyslipidaemia (46.3% vs 65.9%; P = .004). Patients undergoing OR had a higher rate of major adverse events (19.7% vs 2.6%; P = .001) and 30-day reinterventions (8.8% vs. 1.5%; P = .016), with 30-day mortality being 0% in both groups. The propensity-score matched cohort included 76 matched pairs (1:1), with differences in hospital stay and major complications remaining significant, without affecting mortality. At 5-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in the reintervention rate (EVAR 18.5% vs OR 17.6%; P = .67) or survival (EVAR 85% vs OR 91%; P = .195). CONCLUSIONS: In low surgical risk patients with AAAs, EVAR may offer comparable midterm results to OR, with a lower rate of major adverse events and a shorter in-hospital stay. With the current OR-first paradigm in low-risk patients, several factors should be taken into account for decision-making (anatomic suitability, risk of sexual dysfunction, risk of type 2 endoleaks, and need for follow-up).

Endovascular Aortic Repair in Nonagenarian Patients.

BACKGROUND: The increasing proportion of elderly patients being treated for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in the endovascular era is controversial. OBJECTIVES: This study compared 30-day outcomes of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in nonagenarians (NAs) with non-nonagenarians (NNAs). METHODS: This retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database included EVAR procedures performed from 2011 to 2017. Multivariate logistic regression in the unadjusted cohort, followed by propensity-score matching (PSM), was performed. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 30-day major adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 12,267 patients were included (365 NAs). Ruptured aneurysms accounted for 6.7% (n = 819): 15.7% (n = 57) in NAs versus 6.5% (n = 762) in NNAs (p < 0.001). Mean aneurysm diameter was 6.5 ± 1.8 cm in NAs versus 5.8 ± 1.7 cm in NNAs (p < 0.001). The unadjusted 30-day mortality was 9.9% in NA versus 2.2% in NNAs (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed age ≥90 years (odds ratio [OR]: 3.36), male sex (OR: 1.78), functional status (OR: 4.22), pre-operative ventilator dependency (OR: 3.80), bleeding disorders (OR: 1.52), dialysis (OR: 2.56), and ruptured aneurysms (OR: 17.21) as independent predictors of mortality. After PSM, no differences in 30-day mortality (intact AAA [iAAA]: 5.3% NA vs. 3% NNA [p = 0.15]; ruptured AAA [rAAA]: 38% NA vs. 28.6% NNA [p = 0.32]) or 30-day major adverse events (iAAA: 7% NA vs. 4.6% NNA [p = 0.22]; rAAA: 28% NA vs. 36.7% NNA [p = 0.35]) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Age was identified as an independent predictor of 30-day mortality after EVAR on multivariate analysis. However, no differences were found after PSM, suggesting that being ≥90 years of age but with similar comorbidities to younger patients is not associated with a higher short-term mortality after EVAR. Age ≥90 years alone should not exclude patients from EVAR, and tailored indications and carefully balanced risk assessment are advised.

Inteligencia artificial y modelado computacional avanzado en cirugía vascular. Implicaciones para la práctica clínica / Artificial intelligence, machine learning, vascular surgery, automatic image processing. Implications for clinical practice

La decisión clínica basada en la evidencia se asienta, fundamentalmente, en estudios aleatorizados a gran escala.Sin embargo, la realidad del paciente puede ser mucho más compleja y capturarla en su totalidad para adaptarlaa cada caso individual justifica la llamada medicina de precisión, que toma en cuenta sus características genéticas,fenotípicas o psicosociales. Este abordaje es posible gracias al manejo de grandes volúmenes de datos mediantesistemas informáticos complejos basados en inteligencia artificial (IA) y machine learning (ML).Esta actualización divulgativa, basada en más de 50 artículos, pretende aproximarse a la aplicación de IA y ML entodos los aspectos de la angiología, cirugía vascular y endovascular contemporánea. El campo con mayor desarrollopotencial es el procesamiento y la automatización de la imagen vascular, que permite también la segmentaciónautomática de vasos, la estimación de movimiento y deformaciones y su posterior integración en el guiado deltratamiento. La IA y el ML también ofrecen grandes posibilidades en simulación de procedimientos, cada vez másimportante en cirugía abierta, y en la mejora de la interacción del operador con las estaciones de trabajo y sistemasde ayuda, tanto de imagen como robóticos. Por último, la integración masiva de datos abre nuevos horizontesen la predicción de resultados, acercando la calidad y el potencial impacto de los registros a los de los estudiosaleatorizados y mejorando los resultados de la estadística convencional.(AU)

Evidence-based clinical decision is based overall in broad-spectrum randomized studies. However, the patient'sreality may be much more complex, and capturing it as a whole justifies the so-called precision medicine, whichtakes into account genetic, phenotypic and psycho-social variables. This approach is possible thanks to the manage-ment of big data, using complex computing system based in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML).This update, based on over 50 publications, intends to give a view on IA and ML application on every aspect ofcontemporary vascular and endovascular practice. The field with a greater potential development is automaticimage processing, that allows vessel segmentation, deformation and movement estimations and the subsequentintegration into treatment guidance. IA and ML also offer great possibilities in simulation, especially of open surgicalprocedures, and also in the improvement of machine-operator interaction with workstations and robotic systems.Finally, big data integration opens new horizons in outcome prediction, almost matching the quality and potentialimpact of register to these of randomized evidence, and overcoming the results of traditional statistics.(AU)

Incidence, Characteristics, Laboratory Findings and Outcomes in Acro-Ischemia in COVID-19 Patients.

AIM: In addition to its respiratory impact of SARS-CoV2, skin lesions of probable vascular origin have been described. This study intends to quantify the incidence of acro-ischemic lesions in COVID-19 infected adult subjects in our population, describing clinical patterns and associated findings. METHODS: All adult confirmed cases of COVID-19 infection who presented with acro-ischemic lesions and received care in our institution were prospectively enrolled up to May 15th, 2020. The variables included demographics, comorbidities, analytical parameters, clinical presentations and COVID-19 treatment. RESULTS: We enrolled 24 patients. The overall rate of acro-ischemic findings in COVID-19 patients was 1.2% [0.6% for outpatients and 2.9% for hospitalized (ICU and non-ICU patients)], but the observed incidence for acro-ischemia in ICU patients was remarkably higher (23.0%, p<0.001). We have described four different clinical patterns of acroischemia: atypical Raynaud´s phenomenon (ARP), (4); pseudo-pernio (PP), (5); severe microcirculatory ischemia with preserved pulse (SMI), (6); and dry gangrene with arteriosclerosis obliterans (AO), (9). Kendall´s τ correlation with lung disease severity was 0.877 (95% CI, 0.756 to 0.968); p<0.01). ARP individuals were predominantly female, while SMI appeared lately in elderly hospitalized subjects with better prognosis. AO occurred in patients with more comorbidity and younger than those with SMI. We observed other associated lesions of suggestive ischemic nature in other organs in all groups (15 patients of total sample). Plasma procalcitonin was significantly higher in patients who developed SMI (median and interquartile range: 9.99 (4.2, 12.3) mg/mL vs 0.26 (0.11, 0.89) mg/mL; p<0.001), and D-dimer level at hospital admission was significantly higher in AO patients (median and interquartile range: 1166 (1050, 2111) mg/L vs 502 (448, 777) mg/L; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The observed risk for acroischemia in COVID-19 is high in ICU patients (23%). We have described four different clinical patterns of acroischemia (ARP, PP, SMI and AO) associated with lung disease severity. Authors have communicated various lesions of suggestive ischemic nature in other organs. Raynaud-like pattern is reported as a "novelty".

Endovascular Treatment of a Traumatic Axillary Artery Rupture Using the Dual Bull's-Eye Technique.

BACKGROUND: Our purpose is to report a case of an axillary artery rupture treated by endovascular means using the dual bull's-eye technique. An 83-year-old woman with multiple comorbidities was diagnosed with axillary artery rupture after the reduction of a shoulder dislocation. METHODS: An endovascular repair attempt was made, but, despite the use of a double approach (antegrade and retrograde), reconnecting both ends of the severed artery was deemed not possible. 5-mm Amplatz GooseNeck snares were advanced from each access and superposed in a perpendicular plane. A percutaneous infraclavicular puncture with a lumbar needle was made through both snares, and a V14 guidewire was subsequently introduced. The guidewire was recovered through femoral and brachial accesses, and a 7 × 100 mm covered self-expandable stent was deployed. RESULTS: The final angiographic control did not show further hemorrhage, and the patient recovered radial pulse. Follow-up showed complete patency and no complications at 9 months after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The dual bull's-eye technique can be used as a resource tool in cases of arterial rupture, when the arterial continuity cannot be re-established by conventional approaches.

Predictive Factors of Aneurysm Sac Growth in Patients with a Type II Endoleak in the First Post-EVAR Control.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to identify predictive factors associated with aneurysm sac growth over time in patients diagnosed with a type II endoleak (TII-EL) in the first postoperative control after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing an elective EVAR procedure from January 2003 to December 2011 (9 years) in a single center was performed. Patients with a TII-EL detected in the first post-EVAR imaging control and with over twelve months of follow-up were included. The primary end point was aneurysm sac growth > 5 mm from the first month computed tomography angiography (CTA) to the last available CTA. Demographic variables, cardiovascular risk factors, comorbidities, aneurysm-related data, and procedural information were collected. Three-dimensional volume rendering with the Mimics ® software (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium) was used to measure the endoleak nidus. Descriptive, univariate, and multivariate analyses (Cox proportional hazards model) were performed. RESULTS: In this period, 220 EVAR procedures were performed. 63 TII-ELs (28.7%) were detected in the first CTA control (90.5% male, mean age: 75.7 ± 8 years). After a median follow-up of 54 months (interquartile range [IQR], 56.5), aneurysm sac growth > 5 mm was detected in 19 patients (30.1%). Age (P = 0.02) and dyslipidemia (P = 0.03) were associated with sac growth > 5 mm, whereas the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) behaved as a protective factor (P = 0.02). The craniocaudal length of the endoleak nidus (P < 0.01) and the nidus volume (P < 0.001) were the only aneurysm-related variables associated with sac growth. Age (HR: 14.1, 95% CI: 2.1-92.3, P = 0.006) and the presence of COPD (HR: 9.6, 95% CI: 1.4-63.7, P = 0.019) were the only independent predictors in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Reliable predictors of long-term aneurysmal sac growth are lacking, although some variables such as age or nidus volume appear to be associated. Strict surveillance remains mandatory.

Midterm Results of Endovascular Treatment for Complete Iliac Axis Occlusions Using Covered Stents.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment of complex aortoiliac disease is seeing a growing popularity despite the Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II recommendations for open surgery in this cases. However, the available evidence does not focus particularly on patients with complete unilateral iliac axis obstruction (CIAO) (TASC II D4 group). This study reports mid-term results of endovascular therapy with covered stents for CIAO. METHODS: This is single-center retrospective review of patients with CIAO endovascular treatment from January 2015 to December 2017 (3 years). Two types of covered stents were used, alone or combined: the Viabahn self-expandable stent (W. L. Gore, Flagstaff, AZ) and the Advanta V12 balloon-expandable stent (Atrium-Maquet, Hudson, NH). Thirty-day outcomes, long-term patency (assessed with Kaplan-Meier estimates), in-hospital stay, and limb salvage were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with CIAO were treated in the period (87.2% male, mean age 64.3 ± 9 years). A majority presented with critical limb ischemia (56.4%, n = 22). Recanalization could be accomplished from an ipsilateral or contralateral femoral access in 82.1% of patients (1 case needed the use of a re-entry device), and from a left brachial access in 17.9%. Technical success was 100%. About 66.7% of cases received an aortic kissing stent technique. Common femoral artery/profundoplasty with prosthetic or bovine patch was associated with 74.3% of cases. Thirty-day mortality was 2.6% (1/39). Primary, assisted, and secondary patency rates at 24 months were all 96.8%. Mean in-hospital stay was 5 days; no limb loss was registered during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment of complete iliac axis occlusions can offer comparable midterm patency rates to open surgery aortoiliac femoral bypass, when an adequate combination of balloon and self-expandable covered stents is used and an appropriate outflow through the common femoral artery is warranted.

Immunological Aspects Involved in the Degeneration of Cryopreserved Arterial Allografts.

Introduction: Cryopreserved arterial allografts have remained an option in patients requiring distal revascularization or associated with vascular infection, in the absence of a valid autogenous saphenous vein. The objective of this study is to describe the different clinical, anatomopathological, and immunological findings related to vascular transplant rejection. Methods: In a prospective trial, 35 patients who underwent cryopreserved allogeneic arterial bypass were studied, including demographics and conduit patency. Anti-HLA antibody production was stablished prior to the surgery, 7 days, 1, 3 months, and every 3 months since. Clinical and ultrasound evaluation was added after the first month. Donor HLA-typing was retrieved whenever available, allowing for the characterization and quantification of donor specific antibodies. Cytotoxic crossmatch test was also performed. A second group of patients with allograft degenerations registered during the follow up period was studied. In this group, exclusively for aneurysm description and histopathological analysis, they were included those degenerated vascular transplants from the original series, but also those implanted prior to the beginning of the study and degraded during follow up. Results: All patients studied displayed an increase in anti-HLA antibodies one month after the intervention, regarding bypass patency. In total, 14 patients fulfilled requirements for the study of donor specific antibodies, equally showing IgG production detectable one month after surgery. The presence of complement-fixing antibodies was also confirmed. Antibody levels were not related to graft degeneration. No specific immune markers able to predict aneurysmal development and evolution were found. From the original group, 3 patients suffered aneurysmal degeneration during follow up, together with 9 bypasses previously implanted. Average time until the first degeneration was 33 ± 19.7 months, with 30.6 ± 17.7 and 54.5 ± 2.5 months for a second and third degeneration, when occurring. Therefore, subsequent vascular transplants frequently augmented the time for new degenerations, despite increasing sensibilization. Samples from eight degenerated allografts were available for analysis, unexpectedly showing inflammatory infiltrate in only four cases and immune complex deposition in 7. Conclusions: Immune response against vascular transplants was confirmed in all cases, but chronic rejection did not necessarily provoke bypass degradation or reduced the time for new aneurysms to develop in subsequent allografts.